Crisis leadership and the legitimacy of power in world politics

Article

Crisis leadership and the legitimacy of power in world politics

Received 19.06.2025, Revised 24.10.2025, Accepted 15.12.2025

https://doi.org/10.67524/verus1/1.2025.30

Retrieved from Vol. 1, No. 1, 2025

Pages 30-41

Abstract

The aim of this research was to compare approaches to crisis management, communication strategies, engagement with the opposition, and the impact on the internal and international legitimacy of power. The methodology included a case study method, focusing on three cases: Ukraine (V. Zelensky during the full-scale war), New Zealand (J. Ardern during the COVID-19 pandemic), and Hungary (V. Orbán under conditions of energy crisis and Euroscepticism). A comparative analysis of the cases was conducted, alongside content and discourse analysis of official addresses, regulatory acts, sociological surveys, and media sources on the topic. The study found that an effective communication strategy is fundamental for consolidating society and increasing trust, as evidenced by the rise in trust in the President of Ukraine to 90% after the full-scale invasion of 2022 and the increase in trust in state institutions in New Zealand from 48% to 69% at the peak of the pandemic in 2020. These quantitative indicators illustrate the impact of leadership communication on public opinion. In contrast, polarising rhetoric, while sustaining the domestic electorate, complicates international legitimacy. In crisis conditions, effectiveness and adherence to security can temporarily outweigh procedural democratic aspects as a source of legitimacy. Ensuring national unity and engaging the opposition are key to strengthening legitimacy. It is concluded that leaders who employ transparent and empathetic communication and strive for national unity more successfully consolidate legitimacy, whereas populist approaches, while securing domestic support, lead to international tension and the risk of undermining democratic values, which is fundamental to understanding global political transformations and the challenges for democracy in the 21st century


References
  1. 2022 – the beginning of the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine. (2022). Retrieved from https://uinp.gov.ua/istorychnyy-kalendar/lyutyy/24/2022-pochatok-povnomasshtabnogo-vtorgnennya-rf-v-ukrayinu.
  2. A new constituency has been created, but can Fidesz or Tisza be happy? (2025). Retrieved from https://index.hu/belfold/2025/08/06/fidesz-kdnp-tisza-part-kozvelemeny-kutatas-felmeres-orban-viktor-pest-varmegye-orszaggyulesi-valasztasok/.
  3. Adams, N.P. (2025). Legitimacy, institutional functions, and the state system. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 1-20. doi: 10.1080/13698230.2025.2499357.
  4. Address by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/videos/zvernennya-prezidenta-volodimira-zelenskogo-2041.
  5. Address of the President of Ukraine. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/videos/zvernennya-prezidenta-ukrayini-2017.
  6. Baker, M.G., Wilson, N., & Anglemyer A. (2020). Successful elimination of Covid-19 transmission in New Zealand. The New England Journal of Medicine, 383(8), article number e56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2025203.
  7. Beaumont, P., & Røren, P. (2025). Status symbols in world politics. Cooperation and Conflict, 60(1), 3-26. doi: 10.1177/00108367241311072.
  8. Brussels wants to cut cuts, reduce margin, and abolish the interest stop. (2025). Retrieved from https://kormany.hu/hirek/brusszel-a-rezsicsokkentes-az-arrescsokkentes-a-kamatstop-eltorleset-akarja.
  9. Capati, A., & Christiansen, T. (2025). Legitimacy and political dissensus in the implementation of the recovery and resilience facility: The case of Italy. European Political Science, 24, 553-577. doi: 10.1057/s41304-025-00538-4
  10. Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002 No. 33. (2002, October). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2002/0033/latest/whole.html.
  11. COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020 No. 12. (2020, May). Retrieved from https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2020/0012/latest/LMS344134.html.
  12. Crawford, N.C. (2025). Not redeemed from time: The deep time of world politics and the role of chronological horizons. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 79(1), 10-31. doi: 10.1080/10357718.2024.2424319.
  13. Davydenko, B., & Nadelnyuk, A. (2023). The power of words. Zelensky has spoken over 560 times since the start of the war. How his speeches influenced Ukraine and the world. Retrieved from https://forbes.ua/war-in-ukraine/sila-slova-zelenskiy-vistupav-z-pochatku-viyni-ponad-560-raziv-yak-yogo-promovi-vplinuli-ukrainu-ta-svit-24022023-11965.
  14. Decree of the President of Ukraine No. 478/2025 “On the Extension of Martial Law in Ukraine”. (2025, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/478/2025#Text.
  15. Decree of the president of Ukraine No. 64/2022 “On the Introduction of Martial Law in Ukraine”. (2022, February). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/642022-41397.
  16. Diamond, L. (2024). Power, performance, and legitimacy. Journal of Democracy, 35(2), 5-22. doi: 10.1353/jod.2024.a922830.
  17. Dynamics of trust in president v. Zelensky in 2019–2025. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=ukr&cat=reports&id=1537&page=1.
  18. Elimination Strategy for Aotearoa New Zealand. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/2024-05/covid-19_elimination_strategy_banner_120821_1.pdf.
  19. Falk, R. (2021). Legitimacy, crises of global governance, and international relations. In G.O. Gok & H. Mehmetcik (Eds.), The crises of legitimacy in global governance (pp. 285-303). London: Routledge.
  20. Gongqing, L., Sabjan, M.A., & Mohamad, N.I. (2025). Hume’s doubts about politics: A critique and reimagining of social contract theory. Journal of Politics and Law, 18(1). doi: 10.5539/jpl.v18n2p1.
  21. Hatungimana, W. (2025). Democracy on the line? Political legitimacy and support for military rule in Africa. Democratization, 32(8), 1904-1926. doi: 10.1080/13510347.2025.2482598
  22. Have you downloaded your vaccine pass yet? (2022). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19iCineM1Y/.
  23. Heck, A. (2025). Ready, steady, no? The contested legitimacy of weapon deliveries to Ukraine in German foreign policy discourse. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 66(1), 45-75. doi: 10.1007/s11615-024-00554-x.
  24. Hellmüller, S., & Badache, F. (2025). Children of their time: The impact of world politics on United Nations peace operations. Contemporary Security Policy, 46(2), 177-196. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2025.2470590.
  25. Hills, R. (2025). How Jacinda Ardern changed the look of leadership. Retrieved from https://www.vogue.com/article/how-jacinda-ardern-changed-the-look-of-leadership.
  26. Hungarian foreign minister says agrees long-term gas deal with Russia. (2021). Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/hungarian-foreign-minister-says-agrees-long-term-gas-deal-with-russia-2021-08-30/.
  27. I had a very substantive conversation with Alexander Lukashenko. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17LSTcsXdr/.
  28. Ilik, G., & Adamczuk, A. (2025). The EU’s compensatory power amid global transactionalism. Studia Europejskie–Studies in European Affairs, 29(1), 155-171.
  29. Jacinda Ardern’s quiet competence triumphs in New Zealand. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/asia/2020/10/17/jacinda-arderns-quiet-competence-triumphs-in-new-zealand.
  30. Keman, H. (2025). Levels of democraticness and degrees of stateness: Viability, trust and legitimacy in ‘liberal’ democracies. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 18, 505-530. doi: 10.1007/s12286-024-00617-8
  31. Kiwis Count Survey. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/data/kiwis-count.
  32. Kovacs, G. (2025). “Overhead reduction”: We show what we owe Viktor Orbán. Retrieved from https://hvg.hu/360/20250526_rezsicsokkentes-energiaarak-Lanczi-Andras-Orban-Viktor-lakossag-tartozas.
  33. Law of Ukraine No. 1706-VII “On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Internally Displaced Persons”. (2025, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1706-18#Text.
  34. Lee, B.T.F., & Sims, J.P. (2025). Legitimacy through diversity: China’s leadership in the BRICS+ expansion for global balance. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(2), 265-302. doi: 10.1007/s40647-024-00411-6.
  35. Managed Isolation and Quarantine. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.mbie.govt.nz/immigration-and-tourism/isolation-and-quarantine/managed-isolation-and-quarantine.
  36. Ministerial Statement – COVID-19 – move to alert level 4 and state of national emergency. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20200325_20200325_02.
  37. Mittiga, R. (2022). Political legitimacy, authoritarianism, and climate change. American Political Science Review, 116(3), 998-1011. doi: 10.1017/S0003055421001301.
  38. Moret, E. (2021). Unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions in crisis: Implications of their rising use and misuse in contemporary world politics. In C. Beaucillon (Ed.), Research handbook on unilateral and extraterritorial sanctions (pp. 19-36). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781839107856.00009.
  39. Mos, M., & Macedo Piovezan, I. (2024). Leadership in international populism: How Viktor Orbán’s Hungary shows the way. New Perspectives, 32(4), 329-346. doi: 10.1177/2336825X241282599.
  40. New Zealand – Prime minister addresses general debate, 77th session. (2022). Retrieved from https://media.un.org/avlibrary/en/asset/d293/d2938180.
  41. New Zealand’s Covid strategy was one of the world’s most successful – what can we learn from it? (2020). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/commentisfree/2022/apr/05/new-zealands-covid-strategy-was-one-of-the-worlds-most-successful-what-can-it-learn-from-it.
  42. Now in our cities – in Kyiv, in Sumy, in other cities and communities – they are helping the wounded after the Russian strike. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.instagram.com/p/DOTzHAsDKnQ/.
  43. OECD. (2025). OECD Integrity and Anti-Corruption Review of Ukraine. In OECD Public Governance Reviews. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/7dbe965b-en.
  44. Poll: Approval ratings of Jacinda Ardern, Christopher Luxon revealed. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.1news.co.nz/2022/09/28/poll-approval-ratings-of-jacinda-ardern-christopher-luxon-revealed/.
  45. Poroshenko called on opposition politicians to unite to repel Russian aggression. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/3387914-porosenko-zaklikav-opozicijnih-politikiv-obednatisa-dla-vidsici-agresii-rf.html.
  46. Remarks by President Biden and President Zelenskyy of Ukraine in Joint Press Conference. (2022). Retrieved from https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2022/12/21/remarks-by-president-biden-and-president-zelenskyy-of-ukraine-in-joint-press-conference/.
  47. Riggio, R.E., & Newstead, T. (2023). Crisis leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 201-224. doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-044838.  
  48. Rossi, E. (2025). What can epistemic normativity tell us about politics? Ideology, power, and the epistemology of radical realism. Topoi, 44(1), 77-88. doi: 10.1007/s11245-024-10142-8.  
  49. Saad, L. (2025). Pope Leo most favourably viewed of 14 newsmakers. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/693155/pope-leo-favorably-viewed-newsmakers.aspx?.
  50. Schmidt, V.A. (2022). European emergency politics and the question of legitimacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(6), 979-993. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2021.1916061.
  51. Small Business Cashflow Loan Scheme COVID-19. (2024). Retrieved from https://www.ird.govt.nz/covid-19/business-and-organisations/sbcs.
  52. Speech by Prime Minister Viktor Orbán at a conference organised to evaluate Hungary’s EU Presidency. (2025). Retrieved from https://abouthungary.hu/speeches-and-remarks/speech-by-prime-minister-viktor-orban-at-a-conference-organised-to-evaluate-hungarys-eu-presidency.
  53. Steffan, D., & Venema, N. (2025). From comedian to leader of the free world: Volodymyr Zelensky’s news portrayal around the globe. Journalism. doi: 10.1177/14648849251365840.
  54. Temporary exemption from tax obligations for businesses from frontline territories: Who is eligible and how to obtain it. (2025). Retrieved from https://tax.gov.ua/nove-pro-podatki--novini-/924745.html.
  55. The era of emulating the west is over. (2025). Retrieved from https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1968017836816957608.
  56. The fifth President of Ukraine has been informed of suspicion of treason and aiding the activities of terrorist organizations. (2021). Retrieved from https://dbr.gov.ua/news/kolishnomu-prezidentu-ukraini-povidomleno-pro-pidozru-u-derzhavnij-zradi-ta-spriyanni-diyalnosti-teroristichnih-organizacij.
  57. The President’s address on the second morning of a large-scale war. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.president.gov.ua/videos/zvernennya-prezidenta-na-drugij-ranok-masshtabnoyi-vijni-2025.
  58. Today I signed an application for Ukraine’s membership in the European Union. (2022). Retrieved from https://t.me/V_Zelenskiy_official/751.
  59. U.S. Security Cooperation with Ukraine. (2025). Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/bureau-of-political-military-affairs/releases/2025/01/u-s-security-cooperation-with-ukraine.
  60. Wage Subsidy Integrity and Fraud Programme. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.msd.govt.nz/about-msd-and-our-work/work-programmes/wage-subsidy-integrity/index.html.
  61. Wajner, D.F. (2022). The populist way out: Why contemporary populist leaders seek transnational legitimation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(3), 416-436. doi: 10.1177/13691481211069345.
  62. We feel for the Swedish people – trapped in disorder while their leaders spend their time pointing fingers. (2025). Retrieved from https://x.com/PM_ViktorOrban/status/1968193476081717314.
  63. Westlake, M. (2025). Reform-related conflictual dynamics between democratic political legitimacy and ethical administrations in EU institutions and international organisations. In A. Alemanno (Ed.), The law and governance of the EU public ethics system: An institutional perspective (pp. 59-85). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-80372-7_4.
  64. World Economic Forum. (2025). Retrieved from https://geneva.mfa.gov.ua/posolstvo/vsesvitnij-ekonomichnij-forum.
  65. Yeh, Y.-Y., Tsai, C.-h., & Yamada, M. (2023). Public opinion, policy responses, and party politics under the COVID-19 pandemic: Examining Taiwan and its strategic neighbors. Lanham: Lexington. doi: 10.5771/9781666940985.
  66. Zhao, S. (2021). Rhetoric and reality of China’s global leadership in the context of COVID-19: Implications for the US-led world order and liberal globalization. In S. Zhao (Ed.), China’s big power ambition under xi Jinping (pp. 3-18). London: Routledge.

Suggested citation
Memwti, R. (2025). Crisis leadership and the legitimacy of power in world politics. Journal of Global Political Transformations, 1(1), 30-41. https://doi.org/10.67524/verus1/1.2025.30